News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks by danmaz74 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @08:55AM (#43411247)
What would that help? Asking as a EU citizen.
Re:I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks by rocqua on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @09:15AM (#43411498)
Quid pro quo. Hurt the current administration's popularity by inconveniencing US citizens. And in general, Visa free travel is a mutually beneficial deal. If the US stops giving the EU benefits, why shouldn't the EU reciprocate.

Personally, I get it but don't support it. I still appreciate my American brethren, just not their administration. We should hit back at the establishment, not the population. Big point there is reducing weapons import, and adding export tarrifs on F35 parts, perhaps ASML machines aswell.

Re:I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks by mdp2021 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @09:32AM (#43411739)
> Quid pro quo ... inconveniencing

Hitting the innocent is downright criminal.

Re:I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks by mdp2021 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @02:21PM (#43415569)
So, sniper, any arguments? Now you look as if I denounced a vile perspective and some responded with a vile action.
Re:I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks by johnnyanmac on Thursday March 20, 2025 @07:29AM (#43421786)
By that logic, couttries shouldn't counter tarriff the U.S. and take it on the chin.

Sadly the innocent are always the victims under leadership decisions. The method here involves angering them and hopefully overhtrowing the leaders who caused this. we'll see how it goes here.

Re:I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks by mdp2021 on Thursday March 20, 2025 @09:29AM (#43423047)
> Sadly the innocent are always the victims under leadership decisions

What you have stated is that, following your view, "people should impale leaders".

> angering them and hopefully overhtrowing the leaders

And that you would pester John to turn him against Jack. What should happen instead is that John will rightfully react against you (possibly both of you), with justification.

It is very basic lucid plain logic.