Re:Joel Spolsky: Thanks or No Thanks
by unalone on Wednesday January 14, 2009 @01:49PM
(#434014)
Nope! Reread that. Now he's an associate project manager.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
You caught OpenMIKE red-handed. Quick, let's all downmod him to -31337!
Edit: in case it wasn't clear, the purpose of this comment was to block the impending group-downmod of OpenMIKE. He was already at -1 when I posted this. That already happened once today to a brand-new member of HN (rambo), so I'm rather passionate about preventing that kind of behavior.
Yeah.
Sorry, OpenMIKE. I didn't mean to be calling you out. Just pointing it out.
Hehe, sorry, to be clear, it was very good that you did. I just meant to discourage the downvoters, and certainly not to blame anybody.
Let's downmod you instead, for trying to be a wannabe mod. An incorrect comment should be at -1. If it gets lower than that, well that's a shame, but from what I've seen it's more common for it to stay at -1.
Re:Joel Spolsky: Thanks or No Thanks
by run4yourlives on Thursday January 15, 2009 @04:35AM
(#435019)
Or you could just re-read the comment immediately after his, and realize that OpenMIKE added to the discussion and contributed to the community, bettering it.
Nobody is perfect.
Oops, totally misread it. Reading skills -15 for the day.
Re:Joel Spolsky: Thanks or No Thanks
by anuraggoel on Wednesday January 14, 2009 @04:41PM
(#434339)
At the risk of being down-modded...
Nope! Reread that. Now he's an associate proDUCT manager.
8-)