News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Block YouTube Ads on AppleTV by Decrypting and Stripping ... by ryao on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @08:57AM (#43398899)
I remember people promising a rogue CA would not work anymore due to certificate transparency requiring certificates to be published in order to be valid, but it is quite obvious here that certificate transparency was not even needed. A private CA is different from a rogue CA, but if the private CA was not forced to do certificate transparency, I wonder what is supposedly forcing the public CAs to do it for their certificates to be “valid”.
Re:Block YouTube Ads on AppleTV by Decrypting and Stripping ... by vlovich123 on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @09:57AM (#43399454)
> I wonder what is supposedly forcing the public CAs to do it for their certificates to be “valid”.

The power of browsers and operating systems including the cert in the default store distributed to everyone. Participating in cert transparency is a requirement.

Re:Block YouTube Ads on AppleTV by Decrypting and Stripping ... by ryao on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @05:43PM (#43405523)
How is that enforced as it was billed as certificates are not valid unless published, yet it is obvious certificates for a private CA are not being published and are treated as valid?
Re:Block YouTube Ads on AppleTV by Decrypting and Stripping ... by vlovich123 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @01:17AM (#43408471)
As I understand it there are various interested parties who monitor to make sure that the default CAs in the root store publish to the certificate transparency before they sign anything. A violation would be grounds for immediate removal. None of this applies to a private CA you add to your own store.