Re:Mlx-community/OLMo-2-0325-32B-Instruct-4bit
by fulafel on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @12:47AM
(#43395854)
In many jurisdictions it's just sharing that is illegal, not obtaining.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mlx-community/OLMo-2-0325-32B-Instruct-4bit
by akx on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @03:22AM
(#43396574)
Yes. The interesting legal question is that are you sharing the original knowledge if you've transformed it via teaching it to an AI.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ai-companies-lose-b... reports on the ongoing case on the image generation side of the fence.
Re:Mlx-community/OLMo-2-0325-32B-Instruct-4bit
by maxloh on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @04:58AM
(#43397041)
That is called copyright laundering FYI.
Re:Mlx-community/OLMo-2-0325-32B-Instruct-4bit
by anon373839 on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @08:27AM
(#43398597)
It’s a catchy term, but loaded. Copyright protects only original expression, not ideas and information. So if a computer algorithm reads the former and outputs the latter, arguably copyright isn’t involved at all.
There are plenty of good counterarguments to this as well, when you consider the effects of automation and scale. I’m definitely interested in seeing how the jurisprudence develops as these cases go through the courts.