News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple's Secrets Revealed During Trial by vacri on Saturday August 04, 2012 @11:40AM (#4338722)
Mr. Forstall also told the court that his team consisted of 1,000 people who directly reported to him.

This smells like utter bullshit. This isn't a shipyard, but designers and engineers - and they're all direct reports?

Re:Apple's Secrets Revealed During Trial by dave1619 on Saturday August 04, 2012 @12:28PM (#4338855)
I'd be interested in what the reporting structure under Forstall really is like. Jobs said Apple is run like a startup. But 1000 direct reports does seem unrealistic.
Re:Apple's Secrets Revealed During Trial by silvestrov on Saturday August 04, 2012 @01:07PM (#4338969)
Does team imply that they must be direct reports and not have a single layer of managers? With a single layer, each manager (including Forstall) would have just 34 people to manage directly. That's somewhat the same as a teacher handling a big high school class.
Re:Apple's Secrets Revealed During Trial by jmduke on Saturday August 04, 2012 @01:35PM (#4339052)
Team might not imply that, but:

1,000 people who directly reported to him

certainly does.

Re:Apple's Secrets Revealed During Trial by mikecane on Saturday August 04, 2012 @04:33PM (#4339575)
I bet they did. I bet there were times where he went directly to staff and said, "I want you to concentrate on this" or "Now refine this" -- "and then come show it to me."
Re:Apple's Secrets Revealed During Trial by jmduke on Saturday August 04, 2012 @04:58PM (#4339623)
I understand what you mean, but that's certainly not the conventional definition of 'reporting to someone.'
Re:Apple's Secrets Revealed During Trial by mikecane on Saturday August 04, 2012 @05:49PM (#4339790)
I suppose.