News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Naked and the TED by gyardley on Saturday August 04, 2012 @10:12AM (#4338493)
Is there some alternate Wikipedia out there that's not a bureaucratic, inefficient, often self-destructive mess?

If I drew anything from Wikipedia, I'd draw the conclusion that this sort of 'non-political' technological organization becomes intensely political, with most decisions made through behind-the-scenes rules-related politicking by the people with the most time to burn.

Horrifying, because the people with the most time to burn on any particular issue are usually the extremists. I can't imagine the distopia that'd result if things like zoning laws or environmental regulations were decided by the same process.

Re:The Naked and the TED by mortenjorck on Saturday August 04, 2012 @01:22PM (#4339016)
I can't imagine the distopia that'd result if things like zoning laws or environmental regulations were decided by the same process.

You have a brutally dry sense of humor.

Re:The Naked and the TED by gyardley on Saturday August 04, 2012 @03:11PM (#4339338)
Thank you. I like to post where it's appreciated.
Re:The Naked and the TED by skybrian on Saturday August 04, 2012 @04:01PM (#4339492)
Yes, of course Wikipedia is often bureaucratic, inefficient, and self-destructive. I wouldn't recommend putting a lot of time into it. But sometimes it's pretty efficient: some edits are simply accepted.