Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by mc32 on Saturday March 15, 2025 @01:24PM
(#43373896)
There are a few NY democratic operatives of some renown in whose opinion the prosecutions were politically motivated. I think the statute of limitations had expired but through manoeuvering they were able to bring charges. That lends credence to that opinion.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by kacesensitive on Saturday March 15, 2025 @02:18PM
(#43374254)
Saying the statute of limitations had expired ignores New York’s well-established tolling rule, which pauses the clock when a defendant is out of state—something courts upheld in this case and hundreds of others. The idea that prosecutions are politically motivated based on the opinions of a few operatives doesn’t override the legal basis for the charges, which follow existing precedent on falsifying business records to cover up a crime. If anything, failing to prosecute someone due to their political status would be the real favoritism.