Re:SpaceX wins $440M contract with NASA to develop Space Shu...
by ams6110 on Friday August 03, 2012 @09:13PM
(#4337042)
I wouldn't say the DC-10 problems of the 1970s forced McDonnell-Douglas out of the airliner business. They continued in business into the 1990s before being acquired by Boeing. The DC-10 itself was in passenger service until just a few years ago, and is still flown in freighter and military configurations.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX wins $440M contract with NASA to develop Space Shu...
by breidh on Sunday August 05, 2012 @12:13AM
(#4340561)
The DC-10's legacy is really one of bad timing more than anything. Its direct competitor, the L-1011 suffered a very short production run for many of the same reasons, none of which involved safety.
The 1980s ushered in a new era of twin engined widebody aircraft and the phasing out of the flight engineer. These two trijets were consequently a difficult sell, although the MD-11 was competitive with the 747 briefly in the early to mid 90s.
Re:SpaceX wins $440M contract with NASA to develop Space Shu...
by neurotech1 on Friday August 03, 2012 @09:59PM
(#4337171)
The last DC-10 airliner was made in the 80s. The 747 is still in production. People aren't buying tickets to fly FedEx so the safety perception isn't as big an issue.
Re:SpaceX wins $440M contract with NASA to develop Space Shu...
by ams6110 on Friday August 03, 2012 @10:46PM
(#4337298)
Perception is the key, statistically the DC-10 was not an unsafe aircraft. Its hull loss and fatality rates are not much different from the 747.
Re:SpaceX wins $440M contract with NASA to develop Space Shu...
by Tloewald on Saturday August 04, 2012 @08:32AM
(#4338304)
Statistically the 747 is 6x safer than the DC10, and its figures are distorted by the Canary islands collision that had nothing to do with airworthiness.
http://www.fearofflying.com/resources/safest-airliners-and-a...
That said, today both planes are (literally) perfectly safe.
The DC-10s problems all stemmed from a bad cargo door latch design combined with insufficient redundancy in its hydraulics.