News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenAI Asks White House for Relief from State AI Rules by PeterStuer on Thursday March 13, 2025 @05:11PM (#43357265)
Just use what works for you.

E.g. i'm very outspoken about my preferences for open llm practices like executed by Meta and Deepseek. I'm very aware of the regulatory caption and pulling up the ladder tactics by the "AI safety" lobby.

However. In my own operations I do still rely on OpenAI because it works better than what I tried so far for my use case.

That said, when I can find an open model based SaaS operator that serves my needs as well without major change investment, I will switch.

Re:OpenAI Asks White House for Relief from State AI Rules by hnlurker22 on Thursday March 13, 2025 @05:38PM (#43357461)
Why not vibe-code it using OpenAI
Re:OpenAI Asks White House for Relief from State AI Rules by nautilus12 on Thursday March 13, 2025 @08:08PM (#43358481)
Just call it hacking, we don't need new names for coding without any forethought.
Re:OpenAI Asks White House for Relief from State AI Rules by hnlurker22 on Friday March 14, 2025 @12:14AM (#43359518)
Who put you in charge of naming?
Re:OpenAI Asks White House for Relief from State AI Rules by PeterStuer on Thursday March 13, 2025 @06:04PM (#43357681)
I'm not talking about me developing the applications, but about using LLM services inside the products in operation.

For my "vibe coding" I've been using OpenAI, Grok and Deepseek if using small method generation, documentation shortcuts, library discovery and debugging counts as such.