News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Legit: Git Workflow for Humans by CGamesPlay on Friday August 03, 2012 @05:12AM (#4333210)
Looks nice. The two biggest problems I have based off the README, in order:

1. Only 1 git remote? I need at least `master` and `heroku` for all of my projects, and often I'll need one or two extra `github` remotes for other forks/collaborators.

2. I wish it had pictures of what exactly it was doing (git graph-style stacks of commits before/after each commit).

Re:Legit: Git Workflow for Humans by johnbellone on Friday August 03, 2012 @09:28AM (#4333883)
I completely agree with your first point, but I do think that the majority of people using git probably don't have more than a single remote. I am sure there are those few people that are tasked with pulling (and hopefully, pushing) to the upstream, and likely a deployment remote like Heroku probably exists behind some process or script.
Re:Legit: Git Workflow for Humans by moe on Friday August 03, 2012 @10:27AM (#4334149)
I do think that the majority of people using git probably don't have more than a single remote

Strong disagree. Nowadays the majority of git-users probably interacts with github. Just count the number of "Fork me on github"-ribbons that you come across on any given day.

The github workflow for forking a repository[1] involves two remotes (origin and upstream).

[1] https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo

Re:Legit: Git Workflow for Humans by jonny_eh on Friday August 03, 2012 @01:07PM (#4334911)
Just use 'git push heroku' to deploy then. Legit doesn't break existing git commands.
Re:Legit: Git Workflow for Humans by kenneth_reitz on Friday August 03, 2012 @07:10PM (#4336676)
Exactly.