News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Contra Chrome: How Google's browser became a threat to pr... by flanked-evergl on Monday March 10, 2025 @08:30AM (#43319882)
> it doesn’t seem controversial to say if your media diet is bad your vote is misinformed.

This is an instance of the naturalistic fallacy [1] and it contradicts your very first sentence.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy

Re:Contra Chrome: How Google's browser became a threat to pr... by latexr on Monday March 10, 2025 @10:12AM (#43320852)
It is neither a fallacy nor a contradiction, you completely misunderstood the point. What I am saying is precisely that you can defined those however you see fit and your definitions don’t even need to match the other person’s for a consensus.

To pull it to an extreme of simplicity, we can all agree that good things are good and bad things are bad without having to agree on which specific things are which.