Re:Sam Bankman-Fried Thrown into Solitary over Tucker Carlso...
by brunoqc on Saturday March 08, 2025 @01:25PM
(#43302247)
Surely prisoners still have some privileges that could be taken away as a punishment (going outdoors, books, tv, computers, phone, visits, classes/work...
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried Thrown into Solitary over Tucker Carlso...
by pjot on Saturday March 08, 2025 @01:04PM
(#43302071)
Maybe leading with a stick instead of a carrot isn’t the right approach?
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried Thrown into Solitary over Tucker Carlso...
by ethbr1 on Saturday March 08, 2025 @01:24PM
(#43302236)
It's hard to carrot already-wealthy prisoners.
For average folks, sure.
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried Thrown into Solitary over Tucker Carlso...
by pjot on Saturday March 08, 2025 @01:40PM
(#43302372)
I don’t know, I feel like there is much more room for positive incentives than negative. Prisons put people on a pretty level playing field.
Like, the well behaved could be served pork chops and peas instead of slop and mush.
Re:Sam Bankman-Fried Thrown into Solitary over Tucker Carlso...
by fitblipper on Saturday March 08, 2025 @01:57PM
(#43302518)
Have you ever experienced prison yourself or through someone close? Prisons don't put people on a level playing field at all. It is significantly more comfortable to be rich in prison than poor in prison.
That's an especially important question when someone is going through a very long punishment process, like what does another life sentence mean to someone who has a life sentence? You can't execute someone twice, right?
If someone breaks a very important rule in prison there needs to be some way to put an immediate stop to that behaviour and to disincentivize them from doing it again and in a situation like this is seems like solitary confinement is the most effective way to do that.