News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Some Thoughts on Autoregressive Models by yorwba on Friday March 07, 2025 @01:24AM (#43287746)
As the number of self-corrections increases, it also increases the likelihood that it will say "oh that's not right, let me try a different approach" after finding the correct solution. Then you can get into a second-guessing loop that never arrives at the correct answer.

If the self-check is more reliable than the solution-generating process, that's still an improvement, but as long as the model makes small errors when correcting itself, those errors will still accumulate. On the other hand, if you can have a reliable external system do the checking, you can actually guarantee correctness.

Re:Some Thoughts on Autoregressive Models by solveit on Friday March 07, 2025 @03:29AM (#43288271)
Error correction is possible even if the error correction is itself noisy. The error does not need to accumulate, it can be made as small as you like at the cost of some efficiency. This is not a new problem, the relevant theorems are incredibly robust and have been known for decades.
Re:Some Thoughts on Autoregressive Models by yorwba on Friday March 07, 2025 @03:56AM (#43288433)
Can you link me to a proof demonstrating that the error can be made arbitrarily small? (Or at least a precise statement of the theorem you have in mind.) I would think that if the last step of error correction turns a correct intermediate result into an incorrect final result with probability p, that puts a lower bound of p on the overall error rate.