Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet
by micro2588 on Sunday March 02, 2025 @06:37PM
(#43236506)
I think as a tech demonstration project it was successful because they were a bit conservative in some ways that will make the economics look worse. I agree it's far from "geothermal everywhere" which seems to be the hype. You can't extrapolate that from one successful EGS well literally right next to an existing geothermal power plant.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet
by caminante on Sunday March 02, 2025 @06:51PM
(#43236621)
> they were a bit conservative in some ways that will make the economics look worse
Or they simply ran into headwinds on a speculative project. I'll "take the under" when your PR is cagey about basic project attributes.
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet
by micro2588 on Sunday March 02, 2025 @07:23PM
(#43236865)
They do a good job of publishing their results in technical industry publications (advancing the field overall in a surprisingly open way) but I agree can be misleading in their marketing.
It will be interesting to see the results of the Cape project once they do multi-well laterals from a single pad power plant with larger diameter wells. That is really more a demonstration of power plant economics beyond the technical feasibility of creating a horizontally fracked reservoir that can be operated for a year.
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet
by caminante on Sunday March 02, 2025 @09:08PM
(#43237551)
Ah!
Cape Station does look much more significant. [0] 400MW of power plant capacity with 2028 COD and mostly contracted with SoCal Edison? Good job.
[0] https://www.utilitydive.com/news/cape-station-enhanced-geoth...