News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet by kragen on Sunday March 02, 2025 @06:07PM (#43236252)
All the "Real Engineering" videos I've ever seen were full of egregious factual errors, so I stopped watching them.
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet by simplyinfinity on Sunday March 02, 2025 @08:17PM (#43237271)
I follow the channel, can you give me few examples of these errors, as I have not noticed any (I'm not a subject matter expert, or maybe not paying attention enough)
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet by kragen on Monday March 03, 2025 @05:45AM (#43240473)
I checked my bookmarks file to see if I had summarized any of their videos there, but if I did, I didn't tag them with the channel name, as I usually do for especially terrible videos. So, unfortunately, to give you examples, I would have to watch another Real Engineering video, which I'm unwilling to do unless someone pays me.
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet by eldaisfish on Monday March 03, 2025 @09:25AM (#43242028)
that channel is fine. Obviously, there are errors, especially if you happen to know a certain topic very well. Otherwise, the videos are info are fine for surface-level information.
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet by laweijfmvo on Monday March 03, 2025 @11:24AM (#43243343)
The video being discussed in this thread started off with a rather contentious claim about the Earth being a giant fission reactor that was heavily debated in the comments. I’m not knowledgeable about the subject at all, but it certainly made me double take (and even open the comments!) and seems to be overstated at best.
Re:Geothermal power is a climate moon shot beneath our feet by kragen on Monday March 03, 2025 @12:49PM (#43244554)
The Earth definitely does not produce much heat in its core. Most heat produced in the Earth by fission is produced in the crust. Whether that amounts to "being a giant fission reactor" is a question of semantics; it's like an RTG, but doesn't sustain chain reactions.