Show HN: I built a modern Goodreads alternative

Re:Show HN: I built a modern Goodreads alternative by hiAndrewQuinn on Sunday March 02, 2025 @04:23PM (#43235285)

I've seen the latter two, but they are most certainly very rewatchable. I saw Schindler's List again with my wife about a year ago and enjoyed it just as thoroughly as the first time.

>I also gain a lot from a rewatchable piece of content, but you might be shorting yourself by always watching things designed to tickle the dopamine receptors.

Now this I just do not understand. Things designed to be good on primarily the first watch, and allowed to degrade on future experiences, seem much worse for this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: I built a modern Goodreads alternative by dghlsakjg on Sunday March 02, 2025 @05:11PM (#43235765)

Ahh.

I think we are coming from different feelings about rewatchability.

If you asked me to rate movies as to their artistic merit, their excellence as films, I would say that those all fall into “instant classic” territory. However, I would not want to rewatch them in the same way that I might want to rewatch a Coen brothers film, for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: I built a modern Goodreads alternative by hiAndrewQuinn on Monday March 03, 2025 @05:02AM (#43240190)

I agree! I think this is one reason why Rewatchability is an imperfect, though positive, signal - many people mean it in the sense you mean it, and would therefore mark them as not very rewatchable.

That's fine by me, of course. The more signals I have, the better my decision can be made on what to watch next on average.

[ Parent | on HN ]