Re:Mark Cuban offers to fund former 18f employees
by dcow on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:32AM
(#43231409)
I keep seeing this argument. Can you help me understand what parts are serving a hidden agenda?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mark Cuban offers to fund former 18f employees
by davepeck on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:34AM
(#43231432)
Who said anything about a hidden agenda? Can you consider that the current efforts are outright foolish?
Re:Mark Cuban offers to fund former 18f employees
by dcow on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:46AM
(#43231577)
I disagree that trying to curb “fraud waste and abuse” is an outfight foolish endeavor, no.
Re:Mark Cuban offers to fund former 18f employees
by davepeck on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:50AM
(#43231622)
There are effective approaches to curbing fraud waste and abuse and ineffective or even damaging approaches. Which do you believe the current administration is engaged in?
Re:Mark Cuban offers to fund former 18f employees
by dcow on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:56AM
(#43231696)
I believe they will prove effective.
I believe the government is in need of disruptive change. I welcome the effort.
Re:Mark Cuban offers to fund former 18f employees
by davepeck on Sunday March 02, 2025 @11:11AM
(#43231881)
For what it’s worth: I believe they will prove ineffective at best, damaging at worst.
I believe disruptive change should be undertaken with a deep understanding of the history of an organization and a clear-eyed accounting of its successes and failures.
I see no evidence of this. I believe the current effort is, well, a bit more like a recklessly wielded chainsaw.
Re:Mark Cuban offers to fund former 18f employees
by dcow on Sunday March 02, 2025 @11:15AM
(#43231928)
If Twitter was a failing business and Musk didn't have a proven track record, I’d be a lot more skeptical in general. If the nuclear staffing cuts weren’t immediately rolled back, I’d feel more concerned about the ability of the wielders.