News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" by scarab92 on Sunday March 02, 2025 @01:29AM (#43227946)
More likely, overpriced institutions like Harvard will cease to be competitive for grants, and those which offer better value for money will be better placed to submit competitive grant proposals.
Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" by throwyouaway on Sunday March 02, 2025 @09:50AM (#43230993)
Im sure there is fat to be cut but the indirect model eliminates the need to spend so much effort accounting for the 5 minutes this grad student used this piece of shared equipment, 20 minutes that post doc used this equipment. Have you ever had to account for number of sheets of paper printed on a shared printer? Total waste of time when considering the cost of accounting and time of these expensive workers. Indirects are an imperfect solution to a real efficiency problem. I really think the solution is to identify “abusers of the commons”and hold them accountable
Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" by justin66 on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:34PM (#43238042)
Harvard can pay for the indirect costs at issue with a fraction of the money its $53B endowment earns.