Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by ben_w on Saturday March 01, 2025 @03:30PM
(#43223349)
1. Sources vary from 40-45, but also mode not mean; population demographics makes mode go like that.
2. 25 is drafting young men; given where their shortages are there just isn't a benefit to reducing this to 18.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by remarkEon on Sunday March 02, 2025 @01:56AM
(#43228047)
I still don't get it.
Usually you only go up the age-brackets when you are more and more desperate, for, you know, obvious reasons. Ukraine is doing it in reverse.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by ben_w on Monday March 03, 2025 @09:04AM
(#43241825)
Ukraine is desperate. It's (currently) a war of attrition, it keeps going until one side suffers too much and can't replace stuff. Each side has constantly shifting limiting factors.
This is also why we've seen multiple headlines about Russia running out of stuff: they did run out of some things, then shifted to other stuff and ran out of that, then shifted to other stuff… — Ukraine has a shortage of both guns and young people right now.
2. The “so what” is that it’s pretty hard to argue that the war is an existential event if you are not drafting the portion of the population best able to make war (young men).