Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by otterley on Saturday March 01, 2025 @02:27PM
(#43222721)
Why should they be invading any country with refurbished T-62s? And in your precious post you said you were concerned about them using nukes. Which is it?
Why does your care for others begin at NATO borders?
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by brickfaced on Sunday March 02, 2025 @06:35PM
(#43236488)
Geopolitics is about more than feelings wrapped around complex, poorly-understand conflicts halfway around the world.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by otterley on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:04PM
(#43237865)
This statement adds nothing to the conversation and doesn’t answer my questions. And in my experience, a person who can’t answer pointed questions usually understands the situation less than the ones who can.
I’m out.
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by brickfaced on Monday March 03, 2025 @11:40PM
(#43250375)
I don't have a duty of care to every corrupt foreign country with complex, long-running border disputes and interests orthogonal to my own. Does that answer your pointed question?
I don't really care.
>Would you regret it if Russia expanded its invasions further?
They're not invading NATO with refurbished T-62s. This is an insane boogeyman.