> We're exposing the fundamental flaw in traditional interviews: they often measure presentation skills rather than actual job capability.

I understand that helping candidates overcome anxiety can have some benefit. But I would not call personal presentation skills and the broader aspects of personality and communication irrelevant, in the sense that gauging those skills in an interview represents a fundamental flaw. Software projects fail far more often due to personality issues and interpersonal conflict compared to purely technical skill issues.

I suppose a company that has implemented a rote and impersonal interview process deserves to have that process gamed. I would call it cheating and disqualify a candidate who used AI or any undisclosed assistance in an interview.