News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by koakuma-chan on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:29PM (#43191019)
Nobody uses 5dd, you select what you want to delete in visual mode and then delete it.
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by jpk on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:33PM (#43191045)
It's ok. Turn on relative line numbers and you'll see the light. :)
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by koakuma-chan on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:37PM (#43191068)
Relative numbers are overrated. Visual mode is much more flexible. Seeing absolute line numbers is useful for other purposes.
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by jpk on Friday February 28, 2025 @03:50AM (#43203327)
FWIW, I have a bind to toggle relative/absolute. You can have both!
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by AlienRobot on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:32PM (#43191036)
So if I want to erase one word to write another, instead of ctrl+delete or ctrl+backspace, I need to switch to visual model, delete the word, switch to insert mode, and type it?

Doesn't sound more efficient than VS code to me.

Re:The Efficiency of Vim by koakuma-chan on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:38PM (#43191076)
You need to press `ves` and type the new word. Trust me, it's really fast.
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by flykespice on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:44PM (#43191110)
'cw' is way faster, no need to enter visual mode (don't rely too much on it)
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by cbm-vic-20 on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:52PM (#43191165)
The power of the vi-family is that this generalizes consistently. Want to replace everything from here to the next comma? 'ct,TYPE STUFF HERE' I'm not a very accurate mouser, so with a GUI editor without sufficient vi-ness, that means I need to use the mouse to drag a selection, make sure I don't also grab the tiny comma, then start typing. So annoying.
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by koakuma-chan on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:58PM (#43191192)
I can't believe people actually use their mouse to select text.
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by bencornia on Thursday February 27, 2025 @01:46AM (#43191953)
> The power of the vi-family is that this generalizes consistently.

Absolutely! It takes learning relatively few command/motion combos before you are really cooking. The commands are fairly composable as well. I rarely find myself without being able to find a command that can't do what I want. To be fair it takes some time to learn all the commands but eventually you just forget about it and it becomes automatic.

Re:The Efficiency of Vim by koakuma-chan on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @10:48PM (#43191138)
Visual mode is way more practical because you don't always need to edit a word, you might need to edit a few words and/or things that are not words. I always use visual mode to see clearly what I'm changing.
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by theonething on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @11:03PM (#43191229)
Nope, you go to the word, do 'cw' (change word). That deletes the word under your cursor and automatically puts you in insert mode. Then you write your new word. I love it.
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by cka on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @11:22PM (#43191332)
Or 'caw' if you want to change the whole word, even if cursor is in the middle somewhere. I read it as "change a word".
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by theonething on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:32AM (#43191646)
hmm.. I've always used 'ciw'. What's the difference with 'caw'?
Re:The Efficiency of Vim by xigoi on Thursday February 27, 2025 @04:34AM (#43192712)
ciw only deletes the letters, whereas caw also deletes one surrounding space. It’s more useful for other operations such as copying (yaw).