News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by amluto on Monday February 24, 2025 @10:16PM (#43167693)
This:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/19/donald-trump-king-i...

doesn’t really sound like democracy.

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by bruce511 on Monday February 24, 2025 @11:00PM (#43168020)
Democracy is not about what he does. It's all about how he comes to power.

In 4 years the people will vote again.

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by devin on Monday February 24, 2025 @11:25PM (#43168165)
Optimistic.
Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by bruce511 on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @12:21AM (#43168460)
I mean, to the degree in which I expect there to be an election in 2 years, and 4 years, I suppose that counts as optimism.

I've not seen any indication that elections themselves are under threat. Given that elections would happen at state level anyway (and absent disbandment of congress) those elections would elect senators and representatives. Which in turn have the power to remove a president.

So yes, I see nothing to suggest that elections themselves are at risk.

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by Braxton1980 on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @01:45AM (#43168948)
What about constant attacks by Republicans on whose votes counts?

It's happening again right now

https://www.propublica.org/article/north-carolina-voters-jef...

They justify these actions to their voters by lying about election fraud or exaggerating the issue.

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by try_the_bass on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @02:31AM (#43169202)
Did you read this article?

> The state election board and a Donald Trump-appointed federal judge have dismissed Griffin’s argument that the missing information should invalidate votes.

The protests you speak of have already been dismissed (the last link in the quoted section).

Seems like the system is working as intended, even under ostensibly adversarial conditions?

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by DFHippie on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @08:00AM (#43171302)
If all but the most bubbled media have been brought to heel by billionaire owners or threats and the ordinary voters, the ones who sat out the last election or thought it was about the price of eggs, are exposed only to authoritarian-friendly propaganda, I don't have a lot of hope for the next elections.
Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by devin on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @02:00PM (#43175888)
They've fired the people responsible for combating foreign interference operations (CISA), have positioned the FBI and DOJ to investigate political adversaries, and have set up the military to follow unlawful orders. Buckle up. I will be surprised if we have free and fair elections, if we have them at all.
Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by pstuart on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @12:31AM (#43168520)
> In 4 years the people will vote again.

There's legitimate concern that won't be a viable option, and the admin has hinted that will soon be the case.

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by kelnos on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @06:43AM (#43170713)
Fortunately the federal government doesn't run or control elections, so the current administration doesn't really have a say here.
Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by vkou on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @12:11PM (#43174573)
The federal executive also doesn't set budgets, or choose which congressionally mandated departments will be open today, yet it's 2025 and it is doing exactly that. And back in 2020, it was conspiring to send fake electors to cast votes for itself, and to fix vote counts in Georgia. (Which I have heard is also not a responsibility of the federal government, but the courts have called it an official act, so here we are.)

Why do you think that a government that is not bound by the need to follow the law will... Actually follow the law?

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by hayst4ck on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @03:50PM (#43177229)
Democracy isn't what you are, it's something you do. (Timothy Snyder's directly applicable talk on democracy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YY6LCOJbve8)

If you vote, but your votes don't matter, you aren't a democracy. You are a democracy when your votes meaningfully influence policy. In that sense, we aren't even a democracy right now.

It's worth considering that Russia has elections too. They aren't meaningful for many reasons. Real opposition candidates might be assassinated, or a candidate might be run with the same name to confuse voters, etc.

Gerrymandering and unlimited campaign contributions are prime example's of how "It's all about how he comes to power" is correct, but your conclusion is flawed.

Voting doesn't make you a democracy. Voting can be ritualized. Voting can be a form of cargo-culting (Feynman speech worth reading): https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.htm

  "In the South Seas there is a Cargo Cult of people.  During the war they 
  saw airplanes land with lots of good materials, and they want the same 
  thing to happen now.  So they’ve arranged to make things like runways, 
  to put fires along the sides of the runways, to make a wooden hut for a 
  man to sit in, with two wooden pieces on his head like headphones and 
  bars of bamboo sticking out like antennas—he’s the controller—and they 
  wait for the airplanes to land.  They’re doing everything right.  The 
  form is perfect.  It looks exactly the way it looked before.  But it 
  doesn’t work.  No airplanes land.  So I call these things Cargo Cult 
  Science, because they follow all the apparent precepts and forms of 
  scientific investigation, but they’re missing something essential, 
  because the planes don’t land."
America follows the apparent precepts and forms of democracy, but we are missing something essential because votes don't influence policy.

There is much more to the idea of democracy than voting.

Re:Everyone at NSF overseeing the Platforms for Wireless Exp... by andix on Monday February 24, 2025 @10:27PM (#43167788)
That's just a prank. But it shows how little the president cares about democracy, or even monarchy.