News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code by LinXitoW on Monday February 24, 2025 @03:11PM (#43164363)
Got absolutely read to filth:

> You've spent more time explaining why Go's error handling is bad than Go developers have spent actually handling errors.

> Your relationship with programming languages is like a dating show - you keep finding flaws in all of them but can't commit to just one.

> If error handling were a religion, you'd be its most zealous missionary, converting the unchecked one exception at a time.

Re:Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code by sa46 on Monday February 24, 2025 @03:56PM (#43164837)
Yea, these are nicely done. To add some balance:

> After years of defending Go, you'll secretly start a side project in Rust but tell no one on HN about your betrayal

Re:Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code by airstrike on Monday February 24, 2025 @03:27PM (#43164554)
> You've spent more time explaining why Go's error handling is bad than Go developers have spent actually handling errors.

That is absolutely hilarious. Really well done by everyone who made that line possible.

Re:Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code by milesrout on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @06:44AM (#43170715)
I got "You've spent more time explaining why Rust isn't memory-safe than most people have spent writing actual Rust code." So I suspect these are not as free-form-generated as they actually look?