Re:Greg K-H: "Writing new code in Rust is a win for all of us"
by snailmailstare on Monday February 24, 2025 @07:13AM
(#43158641)
I think the pressures are from everywhere all the time. There's always a risk that something picks up enough steam to replace an OS even if it is a derivative or fork of the same OS. For C++ adoption, Linus gauged correctly that it's steam is limited and even directly taunting its supporters had low risk in a project that could challenge Linux because its set of choices over time has had many foot guns, where many developers would intentionally use what any user would consider a foot gun. As long as Linus didn't step in to define strong rules for how C++ would be used there was no likely challenger over any reasonable amount of time (for Linux/C). This is not true for rust.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Greg K-H: "Writing new code in Rust is a win for all of us"
by the_duke on Tuesday February 25, 2025 @05:18AM
(#43170125)
The difference is that at least Google is actively deploying Rust-based Linux code in Android already.
And the big Linux foundation members have more influence than is publically known.
Re:Greg K-H: "Writing new code in Rust is a win for all of us"
by snailmailstare on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @04:05AM
(#43182072)
Linus was pretty clear about his views on working with vendors, etc, in his Autobiography so I'm not sure if/why there would be surprise.
Solaris, Java and C/C++ conpilers were all owned by Sun. I feel that is a situation without anyone even trying to maintain whatever separation some might expect from Linus.