Re:DOGE's Only Public Ledger Is Riddled with Mistakes
by rayiner on Saturday February 22, 2025 @05:54PM
(#43144134)
If Newsom explicitly runs on X, Y, and Z, and you vote for him for X and Y, I think it’s fair to say that you’re at least acquiescing to Z in return for forming a majority coalition.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:DOGE's Only Public Ledger Is Riddled with Mistakes
by littlestymaar on Sunday February 23, 2025 @02:36PM
(#43152402)
Why? That's a very weird line of reasoning!
Then who are you supposed to vote for if you want X and Y but are against Z (but think X or Y is more important than Z)?