Did you read the entire post you are responding to? I clearly said this at the end:

"That being said, these are nice things that people would want to hear so I too am paying attention."

It is in my nature to give the benefit of the doubt.

> It is in my nature to give the benefit of the doubt.

There should be little to doubt at this point, however. "Dismantling of the administrative state" was a mantra for many who are now in positions of power.

Then: "Prices will come down on day 1!" Now: "It's hard to get prices to come down once they're up".

At some point, there's not much reason to doubt someone's goals, regardless of what they say. You can look at past say/do combinations and make reasonable predictions.

Stop giving 'benefits' to people with years of documented track records under the aegis of 'doubt'.

> It is in my nature to give the benefit of the doubt.

I would implore you to develop the skill of judging one’s character overtime. Some folks have proven they don’t deserve the benefit.

Otherwise, I fear that your good nature will become a vulnerability instead of the strength that I can be.

TINSTAAFL. When someone promises you tax cuts, you should be able to name the specific brackets getting their cut and by how much. Otherwise, yep, you are being fooled into padding a billionaire's pocketbook.

> It is in my nature to give the benefit of the doubt.

Then you should be giving the benefit of the doubt to the people and institutions that are accused on flimsy evidence. Then you should be giving benefit of the doubt to Harris and Clinton too, to progressives, to SJWs, feminists, to centrists.