News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One Head, Two Brains (2015) by cognaitiv on Thursday February 20, 2025 @07:58AM (#43114123)
If the brain is a receiver, information transfer could happen non-locally and the tea might be telepathy, precognition, or remote viewing. In the split brain example, demonstrating an ability to coordinate between hemispheres in ways not predicted by neural separation might challenge the physical origin of consciousness as with the chicken and shovel anecdote.

Experiments demonstrating an external source of consciousness would be very interesting.

Not a teapot in this case!

Re:One Head, Two Brains (2015) by cognaitiv on Thursday February 20, 2025 @09:53PM (#43123459)
Or communicate telepathically with dogs.
Re:One Head, Two Brains (2015) by at_a_remove on Thursday February 20, 2025 @10:15PM (#43123615)
Ah, no.

Suppose you do all kinds of studies and not show any telepathy, precog, or remote viewing. You could still say that the brain was only a receiver. None of that would disprove the "brain-as-consciousness-receiver" concept, you would just say that, I guess it is one way, no telepathy.

It's not disprovable. And so, kind of boring.