News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by Kwpolska on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @02:45PM (#43106579)
Modems are harder to get right than CPUs. A CPU needs to do math and work with digital data lines. A modem needs to talk to the mobile network, using radios, and a bunch of standards that were built up since the 90s.
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by bri3d on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @07:44PM (#43109756)
Tacking on: the devil in a modern baseband is in the firmware. The analog domain stuff is generally handled by increasingly commoditized RF frontends outside of the baseband processor, and then either clean analog IQ or more recently, even digital samples (DAC and ADC moved to frontend) are sent to the baseband processor.

A baseband is a really fancy specialized SDR. Most are based on arcane VLIW DSP architectures like Qualcomm’s Hexagon or Samsung Marconi - you’ll usually have several DSPs handling the different physical layer channels, and then some coordinating DSPs doing L1 channel mixing and timing (in 4G and 5G, various logical and transport channels are muxed into the same physical channels).

Then a set of higher level processor cores (usually referred to as CP, sometimes still a DSP but often a general purpose application processor like ARM) will handle the MAC and above. There will be occasional fixed function blocks for some common protocol functions, but generally it’s less “analog magic” in the way people think when they hear “radio” and more “DSP magic.”

Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by nimish on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @09:19PM (#43110316)
If you look at the math it's not even that complicated. Basic statistical inference and information theory.

Seems like the difficult part is doing that effectively while avoiding IP issues -- patents on software and math have entrenched Qualcomm's dominance.

Imagine if all of the IP for ML or AI were held by a single company that got the regulating body (ITU/3GPP) to require their use. Makes a mockery of FRAND terms.

Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by londons_explore on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @11:08PM (#43110991)
Patents are the main thing here.

Building a cellular modem, complete with working protocol stack, entirely in software has been done as a 1 person open source project.

Making a production -ready modem is clearly more complex, but far from hard for a company with the resources of Apple.

However, doing so whilst not violating any of qualcomms huge array of patents is the real challenge.

I'm willing to bet that the release date of this phone probably closely aligns with the expiry date of a patent they couldn't work around.

Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by flkenosad on Thursday February 20, 2025 @12:46AM (#43111537)
Patents are the dumbest thing on the planet.
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by Arkhadia on Sunday February 23, 2025 @10:57AM (#43150163)
Where do you draw the line for protection of innovative ideas?
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by ikekkdcjkfke on Thursday February 20, 2025 @10:25AM (#43115806)
There might be someone in government right now willing to flush obvious software patents
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by bgnn on Thursday February 20, 2025 @05:08PM (#43120931)
It is extremely hard to design a modem like this. Just the ADCs and DACs you need are like 2-3 year development and 1-2 year testing before going into production.
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by jki275 on Friday February 21, 2025 @03:31PM (#43132588)
Also patents. Everything in the cell modem world is horribly encumbered by patents -- many of which I believe Qualcomm owns.