News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by skyyler on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @12:30PM (#43104785)
Until today I thought they were interchangeable spellings.

I'm curious, is "woah" incorrect? If so, why?

Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by quesera on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @12:54PM (#43105089)
Even as the instinctive prescriptivist that I am, I can't possibly get get worked up about permutations on onomatopoeia.
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by swores on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @01:28PM (#43105533)
Not even something like "woe" for woah, or "hmf" for hmph? :P
Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by quesera on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @05:38PM (#43108666)
You raise good points. :)

Actually I like "hmf" despite my usual distaste for the dilution of "ph" to "f". The "ph" in "hmph" seems incidental, so it does not trigger me, I guess!

There is a highway sign somewhere on I-95 for "Fenix Ave", which took me a while to realize was a vicious act committed by illiterates against "Phoenix Avenue".

Re:Apple Debuts iPhone 16e by cptcobalt on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @12:55PM (#43105116)
Whoa is just older. https://www.dictionary.com/e/whoa-or-woah/

Dictionaries are descriptive of actual use, not prescriptive rulings. Both spellings are completely valid, the pedantry is incorrect.