Re:File Pilot: A file explorer built for speed with a modern...
by II2II on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @07:30PM
(#43097007)
On the other hand, 35 years of cruft also represents 35 years of accumulated knowledge about what people want from a file manager. So one should not dismiss Directory Opus based upon a few screenshots.
Fresh blood is certainly a good thing though. I am just arguing that we should not dismiss something based upon its age or cosmetics.
(Directory Opus is one of the few things that I miss while using Linux.)
Re:File Pilot: A file explorer built for speed with a modern...
by speckx on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @09:34PM
(#43097923)
In addition to Directory Opus, I also miss https://www.xyplorer.com/ on Windows since I’m on Linux.
Re:File Pilot: A file explorer built for speed with a modern...
by netsharc on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @07:49PM
(#43097152)
I prefer to use Win10 and probably move to Linux after that, so the interface doesn't match the rest of my OS. It's incredibly fast though.
But speaking of technical debts, I couldn't open a UNC path ( \\nas\share\ ). Opening a network share mounted to a drive letter worked fine though.
Re:File Pilot: A file explorer built for speed with a modern...
by vjekoslav on Wednesday February 19, 2025 @06:09AM
(#43100855)
FP has been mostly tested and improved for mapped network drives, as the focus has been, and still is, on providing a very solid local experience.
Direct network access (and better integration with NAS) will be added in the near future.
If I used Windows regularly, I'd probably appreciate having another option, just as I appreciate (and even take for granted) the ability to switch between various options on Linux.