News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Delta CRJ Crash Toronto 17th Feb 25 by bfdm on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @01:24AM (#43086643)
The comment was merely illustrating the concept in general being used on planes, or at least that's how I read it.
Re:Delta CRJ Crash Toronto 17th Feb 25 by stouset on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @02:35AM (#43086983)
Yeah, but the whole point here is that the engines are very specifically designed to break off in a way that preserves the integrity of the wings.

The integrity of the wings is a function that supersedes just about every other possible thing on a plane. You can safely land without any engines. You can safely land without hydraulics. You can safely land without gear. Without wings, a plane is a brick.

Re:Delta CRJ Crash Toronto 17th Feb 25 by FabHK on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @11:14AM (#43091286)
Indeed. And maneuvering speed V_A is designed such that as long as you don't exceed it, you will stall before breaking the wings off in case of turbulence or full control deflection.
Re:Delta CRJ Crash Toronto 17th Feb 25 by wkat4242 on Thursday February 20, 2025 @04:05AM (#43112619)
I think you mean Vne?
Re:Delta CRJ Crash Toronto 17th Feb 25 by altairprime on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @11:16AM (#43091318)
Here’s the bend test video for the Boeing 777: the wings can bend for something like a 45-degreee arc without breaking, so they ran it to breaking. https://www.homemadetools.net/forum/boeing-777-wing-flexibil...