News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Javier Milei Backtracks on $4.4B Memecoin After 'Insiders' Pocket $87M. Parent comment

Re:Javier Milei Backtracks on $4.4B Memecoin After 'Insiders... by spacechild1 on Monday February 17, 2025 @05:02AM (#43077127)
> The interviewer doesn't need to impose their world view on the guest, or the audience -- it's OK to let the audience make up their own minds.

What if the guest lies or omits crucial facts? How is the audience supposed to know that? Fact checking is the very basis of responsible journalism.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Javier Milei Backtracks on $4.4B Memecoin After 'Insiders... by chubot on Monday February 17, 2025 @10:51AM (#43080168)
What if I go to a dinner party and someone lies or omits crucial facts?

I guess take it for what it is -- it's a conversation recorded on YouTube ... maybe don't be fooled by the suit and the mics. Anyone can buy those, there is no certification AFAIK :-)

(I'd also say that 95% of journalism you see on TV is not much different than a conversation recorded on YouTube, i.e. they don't do fact checking themselves.)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Javier Milei Backtracks on $4.4B Memecoin After 'Insiders... by spacechild1 on Monday February 17, 2025 @03:05PM (#43082819)
The dinner party isn't broadcast to millions of people. With a great audience comes great responsibility. "Just let people talk" doesn't cut it. Of course, there is also lots of bad journalism in traditional media.

> maybe don't be fooled by the suit and the mics. Anyone can buy those, there is no certification AFAIK :-)

:)

[ Parent | on HN ]