Re:Carbon capture more costly than switching to renewables, ...
by rtsil on Saturday February 15, 2025 @09:17PM
(#43064689)
Reindustrialization isn't possible because you cannot reduce your costs to China levels, particularly if you clamp down on immigration as well. The best you can hope for is to diversify the supply by industrializing other, geographically and/or ideologically closer countries that can produce at reduced costs and are also more dependent on your economy or your military might. A suite of vassal countries, if you will.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Carbon capture more costly than switching to renewables, ...
by vimy on Saturday February 15, 2025 @09:26PM
(#43064734)
The humanoid robots will make reindustrialization very cheap.
Re:Carbon capture more costly than switching to renewables, ...
by ben_w on Sunday February 16, 2025 @07:15AM
(#43067443)
Do humanoid robots in America have any economic benefit over the exact same robots in, say, Mexico? Or on a lights-out factory on the ocean floor in international waters? Or on the moon?
Even if they're physically in the US, are these robots driven by AI, or remote control? If the former, does this re-industrialisation create any jobs? If the latter, why hire Americans to control the robots rather than much cheaper Cubans or Vietnamese or Salvadorans?