Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit
by tgv on Thursday February 13, 2025 @05:55AM
(#43034707)
> The problem is sifting through all of the doomsayer false positives to get to any amount of cogent advice.
Why? Because we don't understand the risk. And apparently, that's enough reason to go ahead for the regulation-averse tech mind set.
But it isn't.
We've had enough problems in the past to understand that, and it's not as if pushing ahead is critical in this case. Would this address climate change, the balance between risk and reward could be different, but "AI" simply doesn't have that urgency. It only has urgency for those that want to become rich out of being first.
Why? Because we don't understand the risk. And apparently, that's enough reason to go ahead for the regulation-averse tech mind set.
But it isn't.
We've had enough problems in the past to understand that, and it's not as if pushing ahead is critical in this case. Would this address climate change, the balance between risk and reward could be different, but "AI" simply doesn't have that urgency. It only has urgency for those that want to become rich out of being first.