Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit
by pb7 on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @04:40PM
(#43030041)
Competition is as old as time. There are single celled organisms on your skin right now competing for resources to live. There is nothing more innate to life than this.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit
by sapphicsnail on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @04:57PM
(#43030183)
Cooperation is as old as time. There are single celled organisms living symbiotically on your skin right now.
Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit
by XorNot on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @05:47PM
(#43030608)
The mitochondria in my cells are also symbiotes but thats just because whatever ancestor ate then found they were hard to digest.
The naturalistic fallacy is still a fallacy.
Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit
by gus_massa on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @06:48PM
(#43031062)
The bacteria that are most related to mithocondria are intracelular parasits, so they were probably not eaten while roaming arround pacefully, they are probably nasty parasits that got lazy.
Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit
by achierius on Thursday February 13, 2025 @10:28AM
(#43036827)
But humans aren't living in the "untamed wilds". We figured out that it's possible to cooperate, even in large numbers, in many-thousands-of-years-BC. Since then we're been scaling up the level of cooperation. The last century provides many examples of successful cooperation between even states -- e.g. various nuclear test ban treaties. Why pretend that now of all times it's somehow impossible for us to cooperate?