Re:Undergraduate Upends a 40-Year-Old Data Science Conjecture
by eru on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @08:07AM
(#43012306)
> This is the the strongest argument for not shaming reinvention...
Sounds like a pretty weak argument? I'm sure there are some good arguments for re-invention. But this ain't one of them.
Basically, re-invention for fun or to help gain understanding is fine. But when you publish a 'new' method, it helps to do a bit of research about prior work. Especially when the method is something you should have heard about during your studies.
Unless the victims are world-class..? (Because it's not entirely not self-inflicted)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42981356
Shades of the strong-link weak-link dilemma too