The dems outspent republicans by a billion or so, so 250M didn't do much. If it did, Kamala would've won by a lot.

https://www.axios.com/2024/10/31/democrats-republicans-ad-sp...

Way more billionaires supported Kamala vs. Trump (83 vs 52).

I'm assuming whatever spending advantadge Dems had was more or less squandered the moment those billionaires got cold feet and decided to oust Joe Biden instead of relying on the incumbent vote. That disruption very likely scared off several donors.

But yes, there was also simply a lack of energy in the D voter base in 2024. No amount of spending can recover disengaged voters who simply dismissed everyone as "equally bad".

Dem handling of the Palestine situation went extremely badly for them.

There was no good way to handle it, Pro-Palestinian propaganda was very active, to a significantly larger extent than it is now.

Russia probably played a role in that.

They spent it running ads and stuff, Musk went ahead against the taboo and legalnrestrictions against buying votes/voter registeration and did a million dollar a day lottery for registered republicans in a swing state.