Re:Elon Musk-Led Group Makes $97.4B Bid for Control of OpenAI
by stevage on Monday February 10, 2025 @06:49PM
(#43006865)
Most of these are not evidence of lack of moat.
>Where are all the others?
You're funny.
Re:Elon Musk-Led Group Makes $97.4B Bid for Control of OpenAI
by itsoktocry on Monday February 10, 2025 @06:37PM
(#43006733)
>Come on ... think!
Explain their moat to us dummies.
Re:Elon Musk-Led Group Makes $97.4B Bid for Control of OpenAI
by toss1 on Monday February 10, 2025 @07:40PM
(#43007382)
Start with China spending ~$2 billion to start DeepSeek by training in on OpenAIs outputs, and more to falsely claim it was an independent operation on only a $5million [0] . It did initially create a problem in the markets, and put out a bunch of bad assumptions. But the mere effort put in to undermine it shows it is in the front — OpenAI is the one out front with the target on it's back.
Will OpenAI be brought down? Maybe. But they do have the lead, and are running like they mean to keep it. The future is not yet written.
[0] https://wccftech.com/ai-markets-were-deceived-to-believe-in-...
Re:Elon Musk-Led Group Makes $97.4B Bid for Control of OpenAI
by moralestapia on Thursday February 13, 2025 @07:54PM
(#43043401)
There you go, ask an adult to explain the following image to you:
"OpenAI has no moat ... OpenAI has no moat ... OpenAI has no moat"
If they didn't have a moat, why is there a 500B dollar investment plan for them?
If they didn't have a moat, why is there a 100B hostile takeover on the table?
If they didn't have a moat, why has no one taken their place?
If they didn't have a moat, why did they climb up to the 8th most visited site in a couple years? Where are all the others? *crickets*
Come on ... think!