News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Anthropic Economic Index by alwa on Monday February 10, 2025 @01:49PM (#43003689)
A mentor I respect memorably explained to young me that “it doesn’t matter how big the pot of soup, you can use the same size spoon to taste it.”
Re:The Anthropic Economic Index by beefnugs on Monday February 10, 2025 @03:27PM (#43004731)
Sorry but that mentor has a small practical imagination, a pot can be so large that the top 3 feet that you reach with that spoon could be all oil
Re:The Anthropic Economic Index by alwa on Monday February 10, 2025 @03:49PM (#43004970)
True! Consistency and representativeness matter, in soup samples as in social samples!

Is the soup smooth or lumpy? Striated or uniform? For that matter a soup could (and often does) involve huge soup bones that give it important parts of its flavor, but never show up directly in a spoonful. And you might need something different from a spoon to convincingly rule out some specific rare lumpy ingredient.

The didactic value of sampling the soup pot goes well behind its basic function: correcting the beginner’s misperception that a sample’s statistical power is directly related to population size :)

Re:The Anthropic Economic Index by skeeter2020 on Monday February 10, 2025 @04:05PM (#43005142)
to push this analogy too far, that's because you didn't stir it well, not because the spoon is too small.
Re:The Anthropic Economic Index by prepend on Monday February 10, 2025 @05:20PM (#43006049)
Have to sample to see if it’s stirred well enough.
Re:The Anthropic Economic Index by brookst on Monday February 10, 2025 @09:44PM (#43008356)
No, you can model whether stirring actions should create a representative sample
Re:The Anthropic Economic Index by Terretta on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @07:12AM (#43011905)
Not with immiscible layered stratified flow…

“You're gonna need a bigger spoon!”