Re:Two Grand Canyon-size valleys on far side of the moon for...
by kingds on Monday February 10, 2025 @11:22AM
(#43002016)
2200 would improperly add an extra significant figure, "about 2000" would be okay.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Two Grand Canyon-size valleys on far side of the moon for...
by bena on Monday February 10, 2025 @11:55AM
(#43002394)
I had figured since km/h was NN00, the same would be good for mph.
Re:Two Grand Canyon-size valleys on far side of the moon for...
by olddustytrail on Monday February 10, 2025 @02:46PM
(#43004380)
Naw, it's already been false precisioned to hell.
The original would have been "about 1000 metres/second". That got translated to 3600 km/h etc.
Check how much it charges if it was really 800 m/s. Or 1200 m/s.