News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on /story/42981756. Parent comment

Re: by rayiner on Monday February 10, 2025 @07:02AM (#42999321)
There’s nothing concrete in that article, just hand waving from people trying to keep their jobs. Who needed what clearance and didn’t have it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by dmbche on Monday February 10, 2025 @09:08AM (#43000471)
In the BBC article?

I don't know or care as I'm not a party in this situation.

It is evident from the BBC article that restricted data was shared unlawfully with Musk and that they are asked to delete the data.

What will you do with the name of the person? Prosecute them?

You're welcome to look online yourself for answers for your questions - or chat with a competent lawyer, they'll be happy to help you sort it out

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by psychlops on Monday February 10, 2025 @10:02AM (#43001091)
> It is evident from the BBC article

It is claimed from the BBC article. Even the shopped judge doesn't know if it is or isn't until the hearing next week.

[ Parent | on HN ]