News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Northern California Cities Should Undercut PG&E Now by maxerickson on Sunday February 09, 2025 @09:30AM (#42990901)
One potential reason I can come up with is the dam aging and becoming a liability.

The town may also have been putting other revenues towards the electric utility (so losing money on the service and billing).

It was probably just a mistake though.

My town charges about $0.11 per kwh, with a fixed monthly service fee making the effective rate for a small user closer to $0.20.

Re:Northern California Cities Should Undercut PG&E Now by TheCraiggers on Sunday February 09, 2025 @12:36PM (#42992073)
I think you're spot on. Damn failures are on the rise, and usually it's due to the simple fact that maintenance is expensive and everything has a shelf life. A lot of these dams were built during the same time period and the cost to replace / maintain the aging infrastructure is tough for small communities to swallow. And they're all coming due at roughly the same time.

Selling to a larger company who hopefully has the capital to fix them seems like a bargain when compared to the cost of replacing a hydro dam (or even replacing it with a non-electric generating dam).

Of course, that does come at a cost, and it's probably spread across all rate payers.