News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Classic Data science pipelines built with LLMs by Yoric on Sunday February 09, 2025 @08:37AM (#42990593)
But at what cost?

We're in an energy/environmental crisis, and we're replacing simple pipelines with (unreliable) gas factories?

Re:Classic Data science pipelines built with LLMs by danielbln on Sunday February 09, 2025 @10:56AM (#42991421)
Cost per token has cratered a thousand percent over the last two years, and that's not just lighting VC on fire, efficiency gains are made left and right.
Re:Classic Data science pipelines built with LLMs by Yoric on Sunday February 09, 2025 @02:14PM (#42992861)
How much do we need to progress before it becomes comparable in terms of energy to the (often already rather energy-inefficient) data pipelines we've been using so far?

Recall that while the cost per token may decrease, CoT multiplies the number of tokens by several orders of magnitude.

Re:Classic Data science pipelines built with LLMs by galgia on Sunday February 09, 2025 @08:49AM (#42990665)
LLMs are not the most efficient way to solve the problem, but they can solve it.
Re:Classic Data science pipelines built with LLMs by Yoric on Tuesday February 11, 2025 @08:21AM (#43012430)
They can do it, they're just slower, less reliable and orders of magnitude more energy-expensive.

But yes, they're potentially easier to setup.