News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why LLMs Suck at OCR by 2-3-7-43-1807 on Friday February 07, 2025 @07:50PM (#42979249)
i dont understand. what have llms to do with ocr?
Re:Why LLMs Suck at OCR by esafak on Friday February 07, 2025 @11:47PM (#42980465)
Some like gpt-4o are multi-modal.
Re:Why LLMs Suck at OCR by 2-3-7-43-1807 on Saturday February 08, 2025 @07:38AM (#42982544)
the llm isn't multimodal. an llm can only process textual tokens. what should those tokens be for pictures. the llm gets fed a textual representation of what was optically recognized by another process. that's my understanding.
Re:Why LLMs Suck at OCR by esafak on Saturday February 08, 2025 @08:27AM (#42982816)
gpt-4o is multimodal. The o in it stands for omni.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40608269

Re:Why LLMs Suck at OCR by 2-3-7-43-1807 on Saturday February 08, 2025 @10:04AM (#42983381)
thanks for the link. will have a look at it. if you tokenize tiles and then feed those serially to an llm. i really wouldn't know why someone thinks that's a good idea. you lose all local spacial context not to mention global context if the scan is produced at a slight angle. it's a really stupid idea. of course, provided enough computational power one might brute force a solution that works somewhat well.