News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stop Using Zip Codes for Geospatial Analysis (2019) by ssl-3 on Friday February 07, 2025 @03:00PM (#42976813)
Sure, and in the States, ZIP+4 could once nail my postal location to a subset of 4 (of a group of 16) mailboxes within a particular set of entry doors on a particular apartment building.

But broadly speaking, nobody knows what their ZIP+4 is, while I imagine that most people in Canada know their postal code by heart.

It is interesting.

Re:Stop Using Zip Codes for Geospatial Analysis (2019) by bluGill on Friday February 07, 2025 @03:27PM (#42977092)
The plus four changes all the time so it isn't feasable to know it. The use is large mailers can get a discount by looking it up and presorting mail. If the mail coming into my post office has my mail next to my next door neighbors that saves them a lot of time.
Re:Stop Using Zip Codes for Geospatial Analysis (2019) by kstrauser on Friday February 07, 2025 @04:37PM (#42977755)
Is that still true? I would imagine any reasonably modern computer could map every physical address in a huge region to a (route number, stop number) pair. I wouldn't think the +4 would add a lot of value anymore.
Re:Stop Using Zip Codes for Geospatial Analysis (2019) by bluGill on Friday February 07, 2025 @07:27PM (#42979111)
The sort everything outgoing by where it goes on the truck is valuable. sure computers can sort but this is physical things and so mechanical limits apply.