Re:Doge Staff Stop Using Slack as Agency Transitions to Syst...
by llamaimperative on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @08:46PM
(#42957956)
Really? Because SCOTUS actually ruled the President very well might be immune from any criminal repercussions from mowing down civilians from a helicopter-mounted machine gun.
Seems like there’s at least “a debate” to be had.
There are law journal articles debating whether the Impoundment Control Act is constitutional. And that isn’t a new thing, here’s one from 1990: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/...
There’s a big difference between a law for which there have been longstanding serious scholarly objections to its constitutionality, and a law whose constitutionality has never been questioned in any serious forum