Re:20k federal workers take "buyout" so far, official says
by thesuperbigfrog on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @11:43AM
(#42951165)
>> Congress technically already authorized it when it approved the FY 2025 budget. That's why they are getting paid to September. That money was already approved and appropriated by congress, signed into law, and is the budget for that agency. They're spending that money how congress directed them to, but in a way congress likely never anticipated.
No money has been appropriated beyond March 14th.
"the promise to pay employees beyond Mar. 14 is unauthorized. The Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits an agency from entering a contract 'before any appropriation is made unless authorized by law.' The deferred resignation program offers employees pay that is not currently appropriated. Current appropriations will expire on Mar. 14th and, therefore, agencies currently lack the legal authority to agree to pay employees beyond this date."
Source: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/will-employees-who-resi...
Re:20k federal workers take "buyout" so far, official says
by skovati on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @11:45AM
(#42951215)
Congress hasn't actually agreed on a FY2025 budget though right? We're just running on Continuing Resolutions currently. So the budget is actually subject to change when this CR runs out March 14th.
Re:20k federal workers take "buyout" so far, official says
by dekhn on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @11:55AM
(#42951395)
Multiple people have pointed that you are factually incorrect, so probably best to stop repeating this in comments across the post.
Re:20k federal workers take "buyout" so far, official says
by Jtsummers on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @11:44AM
(#42951176)
There was no FY 2025 budget. It's all CRs again, currently through 14 March.
Re:20k federal workers take "buyout" so far, official says
by tstrimple on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @03:18PM
(#42954526)
In addition to what the others have stated regarding the 2025 budget being locked... Congress also authorized a lot of the things being ransacked right now like USAID. The rule of law seems to offer very little real protections here. So much of the US government is run on precedent and tradition and is incredibly vulnerable (as we're finding out) to folks who give zero fucks about precedent and tradition. Unfortunately the Democratic Party is still completely beholden to those precedents and traditions and have absolutely no clue how to handle opponents who don't.
I'm not a lawyer, but it seems totally legal. There is no requirement to take the money, and it's very hard to get fired from the federal government.