News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell by rendezvouscp on Thursday July 26, 2012 @04:55AM (#4295073)
It saddens me to see OAuth 2.0 in this state. As someone who’s made really minor contributions to 2.0 (and thus listed as a contributor in the spec), I have been really looking forward to it being finished and ready for production use (where production use means no more drafts). I stopped following the mailing list last year because most of the threads seemed all too familiar or out of my realm of knowledge to contribute (read: enterprisey).

I run a 1.0a service provider and write clients against it. I’m thinking about wading through the current 2.0 draft, picking out the relevant parts to small startups with an API, and publishing a post about how to implement the sane parts of the 2.0 spec.

Re:OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell by Robin_Message on Thursday July 26, 2012 @06:09AM (#4295263)
Yes, that would be great, as I'm not sure there are any good docs on writing a OAuth provider.
Re:OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell by DavidWarden on Thursday July 26, 2012 @06:09AM (#4295260)
Please do so! I'll help with what I can and little I know.
Re:OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell by ejesse on Thursday July 26, 2012 @06:36PM (#4299105)
FWIW, just implementing the server-side version of FB's or Foursquare's implementations will basically get you to the same place.
Re:OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell by bsenftner on Thursday July 26, 2012 @05:38PM (#4298882)
please write this up. I gave up trying to figure it out myself.
Re:OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell by ivarkotnik on Thursday July 26, 2012 @08:31AM (#4295644)
I'm in as well.
Re:OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell by vitormazzi on Thursday July 26, 2012 @12:58PM (#4297074)
count me in
Re:OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell by berngp on Thursday July 26, 2012 @05:53PM (#4298953)
I am in.