AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU

Re:AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU by oneeyedpigeon on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @04:41AM (#42930294)

The USA in a nutshell:

We elected a President who tried to lead an armed insurrection but we'll never press criminal charges because we elected him President again.

Sorry, but anything the EU has ever done pales in comparison with that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU by DocTomoe on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @05:10AM (#42930508)

As an European, respectfully, I am not too interested in comparing the stability of my system of government with that of another country. I try to compare my circumstances to a better ideal, not a worse.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU by vixen99 on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @10:10AM (#42933269)

You're right, no competition. Let's face it, your President is a loser who can't even manage a simple insurrection; no proper planning I guess. Fortunately not much bloodshed though the defending side did manage to shoot dead one unarmed female ‘warrior’.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU by linksnapzz on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @11:52AM (#42935008)

Of course. No EU president could lead an insurrection! The working group in Brussels charged with formalizing the insurrection guidelines to produce the right forms for the insurrectionists to apply for their mob permit...is currently stuck hammering out definitions between the Italian and Czech delegations.

They hope the paperwork will be complete by 2053, which will allow an EU president to, hopefully, attempt some kind of coup (if everything is filled out correctly) sometime before 2060.

[ Parent | on HN ]